The ripple effects persist as lower courts continue to apply the Supreme Court’s holding in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016), which established a new “standing,” threshold for plaintiffs seeking to assert a claim under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, more affectionately known by the acronym FCRA. The Northern District of California in Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 3:14-CV-04292 (N.D. Cal. Oct.
Published: October 24, 2016
. . . . . .
Published: September 7, 2016
Today, in Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., the Ninth Circuit ruled that Uber drivers must arbitrate their labor claims individually, and cannot pursue them as a class. See Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-16178, 2016 WL 4651409 (Sept. 7, 2016 9th Cir.). Independent contractor drivers allege that Uber violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act and state statutes by running unauthorized background checks on them.